Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1038

reference
947-tree-1
name
1038
tree-preservation-order

undefined

947-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.022802 50.876371)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.022731 50.876363,-1.022734 50.876377,-1.022744 50.876390,-1.022760 50.876400,-1.022780 50.876407,-1.022801 50.876409,-1.022823 50.876407,-1.022843 50.876401,-1.022859 50.876391,-1.022870 50.876378,-1.022873 50.876365,-1.022870 50.876351,-1.022860 50.876338,-1.022845 50.876328,-1.022825 50.876321,-1.022803 50.876319,-1.022781 50.876321,-1.022761 50.876327,-1.022745 50.876337,-1.022735 50.876350,-1.022731 50.876363)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL